McNulty v. McNulty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the law is “unsettled” on whether personal information within accident reports is or is not protected by the DPPA
• explaining that because the DPPA does not allow citizen enforcement lawsuits against states, the plain text \shows a congressional intent to preclude Ex parte Young actions\
• acknowledging the unsettled question of whether personal information in accident reports is protected under the DPPA
• dismissing Doe defendants 28 from putative class action where plaintiff made no effort to identify such defendants
• “The legal fiction of the Ex parte Young action allows citizens to enjoin state action that violates federal law notwithstanding the protections of the Eleventh Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).