Skip to main content
· 11/8/1996

State v. Predka

Citations

  • 555 N.W.2d 202
  • 1996 WL 411863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probable cause, not the motivation of the arresting officer, determines whether the stop of a vehicle is valid
  • holding that district court properly excluded evidence that it was impossible for nonresident drug dealer to purchase drug tax stamps on a Saturday because before the trip to Iowa dealer should have arranged to acquire stamps before he picked up marijuana
  • holding, among other things, that marijuana was not a proper article of commerce subject to protection under the Commerce Clause because it was contraband
  • holding, among other things, that marijuana was not a proper article of commerce subject to protection under the Commerce Clause because it was contraband
  • holding “probable cause—not the motivation of the arresting officer—determines whether the stop is valid”
  • finding probable cause to search the vehicle based in part on the officer’s observation of a screen used with a marijuana pipe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.