Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/7/1987
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc.
Citations
- 403 N.W.2d 666
- 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing trial court for computing prejudgment interest at a post-commencement date, in an attempt to account for “delay result[ing] from [plaintiff’s] request for a trial date continuance,” and declaring that “the language of the statute is mandatory”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Confold Pacific, Inc. v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-10· cited 61×
- Chavez v. KincaidD. New Mexico· 1998-05-14· cited 43×
- Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.N.D. Iowa· 1998-09-29· cited 35×
- Johnson v. Benjamin Moore & Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-01-28· cited 10×
- Confold Pacific Inc v. Polaris Indus IncSeventh Circuit· 2006-01-10
- Lagoon Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co., a Delaware ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2023-12-11
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-10-12· cited 197×
- Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-17· cited 61×
- Downey v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1972-07-06· cited 60×
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-06· cited 57×
- Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 51×
- Square Liner 360o, Inc., Appellant/cross v. Finis Lavell Chisum and Chief Industries, Inc., Appellees/crossEighth Circuit· 1982-12-22· cited 47×
- LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-29· cited 46×
- Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 37×
- Wilson v. Barton & Ludwig, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-10-04· cited 31×
- Pietrzak v. EggenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-20· cited 25×
- Smith v. Recrion CorporationNevada Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 24×
- Colby v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-02-09· cited 21×
- The Greening Nursery Company v. J and R Tool and Manufacturing Company, J and R Tool and Manufacturing Company v. The Greening Nursery CompanyEighth Circuit· 1967-05-09· cited 20×
- Renne v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-01-28· cited 20×
- Belt v. Hamilton Nat. BankDistrict of Columbia· 1952-12-08· cited 18×
- Dewey v. American Stair Glide Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-10-11· cited 17×
- Hiedeman v. HiedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-05-07· cited 12×
- Shanco International, Ltd. v. Digital Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-11-21· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.