Confold Pacific, Inc. v. Polaris Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the term “unjust enrichment” has multiple “referents” because it can refer to several factually distinct circumstances in which restitution is appropriate
• finding no unjust enrichment based on misuse of confidential information where Wisconsin law did not permit such a cause of action, and plaintiff failed to plead unfair competition or secret misappropriation under Wisconsin law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).