Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting relevant cases and holding that Nebraska law might permit an action for conversion of an unpatented idea
• describing the ’240 patent and distinguishing it from the Re482 patent
• judicial review of agency action under the APA limited 24 to the administrative record
• “The court concludes that, because Nebraska has not specifically foreclosed the possibility of a claim for conversion of an intangible, unpatented idea, this court cannot conclude that there is an ‘insuperable bar to relief on Dethmers’s conversion claim.”
• discussing the “place of injury” factor
• discussing Iowa application of Restatement (Second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).