New York Court of Appeals· 7/6/1972
Downey v. General Foods Corp.
Citations
- 31 N.Y.2d 56
- 286 N.E.2d 257
- 175 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 374
- 334 N.Y.S.2d 874
- 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiffs hope that he may be able to prove that defendant’s witnesses lied is insufficient to defeat motion for summary judgment
- dismissing claims for misappropriation, breach of express contract, breach of implied contract, and unjust enrichment after finding lack of novelty
- dismissing claims for misappropriation, breach of express contract, breach of implied contract, and unjust enrichment after finding lack of novelty
- no novelty because defendant had “envisaged” and “utilized” plaintiff’s idea for “years before the plaintiff submitted it”
- no novelty because defendant had \envisaged\ and \utilized\ plaintiff's idea for \years before the plaintiff submitted it\
- “Lack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-10-06· cited 327×
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZThird Circuit· 2004-12-21· cited 219×
- Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsSecond Circuit· 1988-04-18· cited 152×
- Craig P. Nadel, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2000-03-27· cited 136×
- Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 126×
- Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardSecond Circuit· 1993-06-11· cited 70×
- Ferber v. Sterndent Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1980-10-07· cited 58×
- Manning v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals· 1997-11-20· cited 57×
- Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-02-21· cited 55×
- Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.E.D. New York· 1981-12-31· cited 43×
- Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-11-22· cited 37×
- McGhan v. EbersolS.D. New York· 1985-04-12· cited 37×
- Zuccarini v. Ziff-Davis Media, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-06-16· cited 36×
- Associated Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. RuffMontana Supreme Court· 2018-07-24· cited 35×
- M.H. Segan Ltd. Partnership v. Hasbro, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-05-02· cited 28×
- AEB & Associates Design Group, Inc. v. Tonka Corp.S.D. New York· 1994-05-25· cited 28×
- Decorative Aides Corp. v. Staple Sewing Aides Corp.S.D. New York· 1980-06-30· cited 27×
- Garrido v. Burger King Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-27· cited 27×
- Paul v. HaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-10-19· cited 17×
- Jane Ring v. Estee Lauder, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1989-05-04· cited 13×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lueddecke v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Eighth Circuit· 1934-03-16· cited 32×
- Soule v. Bon Ami Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1922-06-29· cited 32×
- J. Irizarry Y Puente v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeFirst Circuit· 1957-10-28· cited 17×
- Puente v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeD. Massachusetts· 1957-02-26· cited 3×
- Anthony Santilli v. Philip Morris & Co., Ltd., Inc.Second Circuit· 1960-10-05· cited 2×
Other cases named Downey v. General Foods Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.