Laurel, Inc. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if there is a clear constitutional taking and if no statutory provision for the awarding of damages exists, “the court does have jurisdiction to determine the plaintiffs remedy”
• defining the word “taken” as used in both the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article First, Section 11 of the Connecticut Constitution
• discussing development of takings jurisprudence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).