Skip to main content

Tamez v. State

Citations

  • 27 S.W.3d 668
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6042
  • 2000 WL 1238853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding counsel prolonged voir dire where he spent 20 percent of his time discussing the variance between the indictment and proof when there was no variance issue at trial
  • holding counsel prolonged voir dire where he spent 20 percent of his time discussing the variance between the indictment and proof when there was no variance issue at trial
  • holding defendant waived appellate complaint that indictment was filed in district court other than district court that impaneled grand jury because such defect “concern[ed] a procedural irregularity which [the defendant] should have raised in a pre-trial motion”
  • “Settled case law establishes that a defendant may not complain for the first time on appeal that he has been tried and convicted in a court other than the one to which the indictment was returned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.