Skip to main content

Rogers v. State

Citations

  • 44 S.W.3d 244
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2369
  • 2001 WL 360700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant counsel more time when counsel could have completed her voir dire had she not engaged in irrelevant and immaterial discussions
  • holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant counsel more time when counsel could have completed her voir dire had she not engaged in irrelevant and immaterial discussions
  • finding “that the Hudson test is not appropriate for prison. disciplinary sanctions [as] [i]t is well-established that sanctions assessed by a prison do not preclude the state from prosecuting' a prisoner for the same conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.