Skip to main content

Burnett v. State

Citations

  • 959 S.W.2d 652
  • 1997 WL 269517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to use Rule 2(b) to allow remand for an out-of-time motion for a new trial because record did not support claim of denial of counsel
  • refusing to use Rule 2(b) to allow remand for an out-of-time motion for a new trial because record did not support claim of denial of counsel
  • notice of appeal by trial counsel on date of sentencing together with record notations that appellate counsel was “to be determined” demonstrated that trial counsel was no longer representing appellant
  • “The filing of pro se matters does not establish deprivation of counsel, because the practice is commonplace when defendants are represented by counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taft, Mirabal, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.