Systems Management, Inc. v. Loiselle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a complaint did not state a claim under the closed-ended theory where the scheme related to the fraudulent maintenance of a single contract, even though that scheme included multiple fraudulent acts
• noting that a single scheme may be reached by RICO if it is “reasonably broad and far reaching”
• finding the absence of a broad and far reaching racketeering scheme where the defendant, had secured and maintained a contract with a state-run college system through several acts of mail fraud
• describing “pattern of racketeering activity” actionable in a 3 Plaintiff asserts a claim that § 16(e
• “Reliance is doubtless the most obvious way in which fraud can cause harm, but it is not the only way”
• 21-month scheme involving mail fraud was not actionable under RICO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).