Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., and Fujisawa Usa, Inc. v. John K. Kapoor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he facts constituting [inquiry] notice must be sufficiently probative of fraud” (emphasis added)
• noting that “[t]he facts constituting [inquiry] notice must be sufficiently probative of fraud” (emphasis added)
• “The facts constituting [inquiry] notice must be sufficien[t] . . . to incite the victim to investigate” and “to enable him to tie up any loose ends and complete the investigation in time to file a timely suit”
• “The facts constituting [inquiry] notice must be sufficien[t] . . . to incite the victim to investigate” and “to enable him to tie up any loose ends and complete the investigation in time to file a timely suit”
• “The facts constituting [inquiry] notice must be sufficien[t] . . . to incite the victim to investigate” and “to enable him to tie up any loose ends and complete the investigation in time to file a timely suit”
• “We reject the suggestion that the defrauded purchaser of a company is presumed to be on notice of everything in the company’s files, so that the statute of limitations begins to run at the moment of the acquisition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).