Alaska Supreme Court· 8/15/1986
Sylvester v. Sylvester
Citations
- 723 P.2d 1253
- 1986 Alas. LEXIS 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that transferees are indispensable parties in actions to recover fraudulent conveyances
- looking to Hawaii law to assess whether a conveyance of Hawaii property was fraudulent
- motion to strike mortgage should not have been granted because adverse party was not given adequate opportunity to argue for admission
- \Both longstanding common law and cases arising under comparable versions of [Alaska's] Civil Rule 19 hold a grantee of an alleged fraudulent conveyance indispensable to a proceeding to strike the transfer.\
- although no Hawaii court has examined the common law badges of fraudulent conveyance since territorial days, there is no reason to believe that Hawaii will not recognize the badges
- grantee of alleged fraudulent conveyance is indispensable to proceeding to strike the transfer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-12-16· cited 50×
- Thomas, Head & Greisen Employees Trust v. BusterNinth Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 38×
- Messerli v. Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-02-17· cited 32×
- Diamond Heights Village Ass'n v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2011-06-07· cited 31×
- Sarah D. v. John D.Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-06-12· cited 24×
- Dimeff v. Estate of Robert Merle CowanAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-05-03· cited 13×
- B.B.P. Corp. v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-08-26· cited 13×
- Rowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2015-11-25· cited 13×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 12×
- Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. Thurston v. Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. StaufferAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-05-26· cited 12×
- Sherry v. RossD. Hawaii· 1994-03-18· cited 5×
- State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. CaldeiraNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-03-16· cited 4×
- Adam F. v. Caitlin B.Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-07-12· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,299×
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court· 1909-11-01· cited 284×
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-05-17· cited 194×
- Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 101×
- Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. StepanoffAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-10· cited 54×
- Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-04-09· cited 51×
- Siggelkow v. SiggelkowAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-04-30· cited 50×
- Padgett v. TheusAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-05-10· cited 31×
- Barrett v. GagnonAlaska Supreme Court· 1973-12-17· cited 24×
- First National Bank of Fairbanks v. EnzlerAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 22×
- Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-11-30· cited 20×
- Mohar v. McLelland Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court· 1972-09-25· cited 19×
- Johnson v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court· 1977-12-22· cited 13×
- Dameron v. DeerN.D. Georgia· 1980-11-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.