· 12/30/1977
Wood v. Elling Corp.
Citations
- 572 P.2d 755
- 20 Cal. 3d 353
- 142 Cal. Rptr. 696
- 1977 Cal. LEXIS 200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he concurrence of the three factors present 6 in Bollinger is essential to an application of the rule stated therein.
- “[A] party cannot deduct from the period of the statute of limitations applicable to his case the time consumed by the pendency of an action in which he sought to have the matter adjudicated, but which was dismissed.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manuel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.