Skip to main content
· 11/25/2015

Rowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Citations

  • 361 P.3d 910
  • 2015 Alas. LEXIS 145
  • 2015 WL 7709456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the child’s best interests are paramount during termination proceedings” and citing A.A. v. State, Dep’t of Family & Youth Servs., 982 P.2d 256, 260 (Alaska 1999)
  • “The Alaska Statutes and our precedent establish a clear policy: The best interests of children, including the interest in permanency as opposed to leaving children in limbo, are paramount.”
  • first quoting Hannah B. v. State, Dep’t of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children’s Servs., 289 P.3d 924, 930 (Alaska 2012); then quoting A.A. v. State, Dep’t of Family & Youth Servs., 982 P.2d 256, 259 (Alaska 1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.