Padgett v. Theus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants \should be enjoined from asserting that [the party to be joined]'s interest in the present case requires that the judgment be set aside on grounds of failure to join an indispensable party\
• \Ordinarily an issue which was not raised in the trial court will not be treated on appeal.\
• \Ordinarily an issue which was not raised in the trial court will not be treated on appeal.\
• “Ordinarily an issue which was not raised in the trial court will not be treated on appeal.”
• \Ordinarily an issue which was not raised in the trial court will not be treated on appeal.\
• interpret ing former Civil Rule 19, the court held that a party is estopped from raising an indispensable party issue where the absent party, “with full knowledge of the scope and potential impact of [the] litigation upon his interests, chose not to intervene as a party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).