Skip to main content

Swearingen v. State

Citations

  • 303 S.W.3d 728
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
  • 2010 WL 445694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a witness’s “conclusory statement” that “individuals deposit their DNA on objects that they touch” was not “concrete evidence that biological material existed on the evidence sought to be tested”
  • holding that a witness’s “conclusory statement” that “individuals deposit their DNA on objects that they touch” was not “concrete evidence that biological material existed on the evidence sought to be tested”
  • stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy Chapter 64 burden
  • stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy the Chapter 64 burden
  • stating that “a mere 5 assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy an appellant’s Chapter 64 burden
  • stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy Chapter 64 burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.