Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 541 S.W.3d 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • instructing that an accused must show by a greater than 50% likelihood that he would not have been convicted if the proposed testing’s exculpatory results were available at the time of his trial
  • noting that circumstances surrounding the request may be considered, including: the promptness of the request, the temporal proximity between the request and the sentence’s execution, and the ability to request the testing earlier
  • affirming the denial of a motion for post-conviction DNA testing where the trial court credited testimony that “many people handled [the] exhibits without gloves”
  • denying DNA testing of evidence that had “been contamin- ated, tampered with, or altered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.