Holberg, Brittany Marlowe AKA Johnson, Brittany Marlowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting without deciding that \this amendment to Article 64.01(a) [may] operate[] to lessen the burden on Chapter 64 movants to prove the existence of biological material within the items they seek to have tested\
• stating that robbery requires only attempted theft
• “The jury found the appellant guilty as charged in the indictment and assessed a sentence of death.”
• explaining exculpatory evidence does not necessarily negate other inculpatory evidence
• Chapter 64 requires convicted person to “show by a preponderance of the evidence (that is, greater than 50% likelihood) that [he] would not have been convicted had any exculpatory results generated by the proposed testing been available at the time of [his] trial.”
• Chapter 64 requires convicted person to “show by a preponderance of the evidence (that is, greater than 50% likelihood) that [he] would not have been convicted had any exculpatory results generated by the proposed testing been available at the time of [his] trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).