Skip to main content

Sunridge Development Corp. v. RB & G Engineering, Inc.

Citations

  • 2013 UT App 146
  • 305 P.3d 171
  • 736 Utah Adv. Rep. 19
  • 2013 WL 2631729
  • 2013 Utah App. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mere conclusions and conjecture will not suffice.. . . [A] plaintiff must provide supporting evidence” of lost profit damages. (quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • “Mere conclusions and conjecture will not suffice.... [A] plaintiff must provide supporting evidence” of lost profit damages. (quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • “At the summary judgment stage, ‘mere conclusions and conjecture’ are insufficient to establish a prima facie case as to the amount of damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frederic, Thorne, Voros, William

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.