Court of Appeals of Utah· 1/16/2014
Winegar v. Springville City
Citations
- 319 P.3d 1
- 2014 UT App 9
- 752 Utah Adv. Rep. 59
- 2014 WL 173015
- 2014 Utah App. LEXIS 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding WRA claim could proceed even where plaintiff 6 received payment of wages due through a separate lawsuit “[b]ecause [plaintiff] is entitled to 7 costs and attorney fees in addition to the exemplary damages”
- “[T]he 18 employer must have knowledge of any wage withholding policies and fail to correct any 19 improper wage withholding to be liable under RCW 49.52.070 for wage withholding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Authored, Christiansen, McHugh, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Winegar v. Springville City
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.