Pellegrini v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the proponent of expert testimony must show that the expert’s opinion is based on reliable methodology
• recognizing that a fundamental miscarriage of justice will defeat the statutory procedural bars at NRS 34.726 and NRS 34.810
• holding that equitable estoppel requires justifiable reliance by the party invoking the doctrine
• recognizing that fundamental miscarriage of 17 justice requires a showing of actual innocence
• acknowledging that a court could entertain a petition for post-conviction relief filed after NRS 34.726(1
• holding that where an issue has been decided on 14 its merits by the Nevada Supreme Court, the high court’s ruling is the law of the case, and the issue 15 will not be revisited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).