Skip to main content

Sullivan v. State

Citations

  • 990 P.2d 1258
  • 115 Nev. 383
  • 1999 Nev. LEXIS 69

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an agreement to concur in the parole and probation department's recommendation did not preclude the State from making comments intending to support the sentence that the State agreed to recommend
  • holding that a promise to recommend a particular sentence does not restrict the State from arguing or presenting facts in favor of its sentence recommendation, although the State must be careful to avoid explicitly or implicitly undermining that recommendation
  • reviewing a prosecutor's unobjected-to comments which were contrary to a plea agreement because they may have violated defendant's due process rights
  • reviewing a prosecutor’s unobjected-to comments which were contrary to a plea agreement because they may have violated defendant’s due process rights
  • reviewing claim for plain error when appellant failed to make a contemporaneous objection
  • construing plea agreement according to what a defendant reading it would reasonably understand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.