· 8/6/1975
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Thomas
Citations
- 342 A.2d 671
- 275 Md. 628
- 1975 Md. LEXIS 993
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Although the Act \is to be liberally construed ... this does not mean that the Act should be construed to provide for compensation beyond that authorized by its provisions and purpose.\
- Although the Act “is to be liberally construed ... this does not mean that the Act should be construed to provide for compensation beyond that authorized by its provisions and purpose.”
- Although the Act “is to be liberally construed ... this does not mean that the Act should be construed to provide for compensation beyond that authorized by its provisions and purpose.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.