Subsequent Injury Fund v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that former Article 101, “ § 40(c) gives the Commission a revisionary power” that allows it to reconsider and revise its earlier decisions “at its discretion”
• interpreting 9-736(b)’s predecessor, former Md.Code Ann., art. 101, § 40(c), substantially the same as § 9-736(b)
• characterizing Art. 101, § 40(c) as “one of the broadest” reopening provisions
• discussing Article 101, § 40, the precursor to Md.Code § 9-736
• even if res judicata applicable to Commission decision, effect limited by Art. 101, § 40(c)
• characterizing Maryland’s reopening provisions as “one of the broadest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).