Lombardi v. Montgomery County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant’s sworn testimony before the Workers’ Compensation Commission, which appellant had attached as an exhibit, generated a dispute as to when appellant knew that his hypertension was related to his work as a firefighter
• “Drawing all inferences in his favor, we hold that reasonable minds could have differed as to when appellant had the requisite knowledge. Disposing of the issue by way of summary judgment was, therefore, completely inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).