Skip to main content
· 10/16/1967

Department of Motor Vehicles v. Greyhound Corporation

Citations

  • 234 A.2d 255
  • 247 Md. 662
  • 1967 Md. LEXIS 414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a newer statute may more accurately reflect the General Assembly’s intent as the “last expression of the legislative will”
  • disapproving a proposed interpretation that would “add[] to [a statute], by judicial fiat, a provision which the Legislature did not see fit to include”
  • “The legislative intent is to be sought in the first instance in the words used in the statute ....”
  • “By making these two items the sole exceptions, the statute is as plain as if it had listed all of the [items] not included in the exceptions.”
  • “By making these two items the sole exceptions, the statute is as plain as if it had listed all of the [items] not included in the exceptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Oppenheimer, McWilliams, Rutledge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.