Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/30/2003
Stroud v. State
Citations
- 787 N.E.2d 430
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 743
- 2003 WL 1986651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing for new trial because the trial court abused its discretion by failing to properly follow the Lindsey procedure after learning that a portion of the jury was exposed to potentially prejudicial media coverage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedlander, Najam, Sharpnack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-05-11· cited 124×
- Bradley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 84×
- Schlomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-11-07· cited 74×
- Bald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 61×
- Robinette v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-01-11· cited 35×
- Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-26· cited 24×
- Dixon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-07· cited 13×
- Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-11· cited 11×
- Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-10-16· cited 10×
- Dupree v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-07-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.