Skip to main content

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 476 N.E.2d 847
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant need not personally touch another person because battery may be committed by the unlawful touching by defendant or by any other substance put in motion by defendant
  • holding intent to touch satisfied where defendant -fired- bullets at officer
  • upholding conviction for attempted battery despite contention that defendant sought only to escape from police officers when he fired shots
  • “While battery requires defendant to have intended to touch another person, defendant need not personally touch another person since battery may be committed by the unlawful touching by defendant or by any other substance put in motion by defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunter, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.