Tenth Circuit· 12/3/2018
Straub v. BNSF Ry. Co.
Citations
- 909 F.3d 1280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when reviewing ruling on motion to dismiss, we “accept[] as true all well-pleaded factual allegations in a complaint and view[] those allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff”
- discussing the development and historical treatment claims under FELA premised on a violation of LIA
- construing and analyzing the term “appurtenance” for claims under statute and regulation in tandem regarding a faulty seat adjustment mechanism and stating that Section 229.7 “reiterat[es] the duties LIA imposes on railroad operators”
- “Unlike FELA, where proof of negligence is required, LIA imposes on railroad carriers an absolute duty to maintain the locomotive in proper condition and safe to operate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bacharach, Murphy, McHugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schulenberg v. BNSF Ry. Co.Tenth Circuit· 2018-12-27· cited 69×
- Farmer v. Kansas State UniversityTenth Circuit· 2019-03-18· cited 61×
- Butler v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'Rs for San Miguel Cnty.Tenth Circuit· 2019-03-29· cited 19×
- Kansas Natural Resource v. United States Dept of InteriorTenth Circuit· 2020-08-24· cited 18×
- Thornton v. Tyson FoodsTenth Circuit· 2022-03-11· cited 3×
- Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers v. FRAD.C. Circuit· 2022-07-15· cited 3×
- Butler v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners for San Miguel Cnty.Tenth Circuit· 2019-06-04
- Gary Miller v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-10-08
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 1,351×
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court· 1995-02-28· cited 1,256×
- Gee v. PachecoTenth Circuit· 2010-10-26· cited 1,070×
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 758×
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 720×
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court· 1958-02-03· cited 440×
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 422×
- Moore v. GuthrieTenth Circuit· 2006-02-22· cited 365×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-02-25· cited 364×
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court· 1943-01-11· cited 248×
- Peterson v. GrishamTenth Circuit· 2010-02-01· cited 164×
- Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.Supreme Court· 2012-02-29· cited 135×
- Michael P. McGinn v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1996-12-12· cited 130×
- United States v. Edward J.Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-15· cited 88×
- Southern Railway Co. v. LunsfordSupreme Court· 1936-03-02· cited 86×
- Chester Oglesby v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyNinth Circuit· 1993-09-24· cited 85×
- Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyTenth Circuit· 1987-04-22· cited 78×
- Matson v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadTenth Circuit· 2001-02-21· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.