Peterson v. Grisham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the context of reviewing the grant of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, this court will \accept all well-pled factual allegations as true and view these allegations in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party\
• applying Oklahoma civil conspiracy law and finding that “close temporal proximity” does not prove illegal activity
• applying Oklahoma civil conspiracy law and finding that “close temporal proximity” does not prove illegal activity
• stating the general proposition, as recognized in Oklahoma law, that “‘an underlying unlawful act is necessary to prevail on a civil conspiracy claim’” (citation omitted)
• “Dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is appropriate if the complaint alone is legally insufficient to state a claim.”
• “To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to make her ‘claim for relief . . . plausible on its face.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).