United States v. Edward J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party can’t obtain reversal by inducing court action and then characterizing that action as erroneous
• rejecting such presumptions under Fed. R. Evid. 803(4) and declining to adopt Olesen rationale
• “The invited error doctrine prevents a party from inducing action by a court and later seeking reversal on the ground that the requested action was error.”
• “The invited error doctrine prevents a party from inducing action by a court and later seeking reversal on the ground that the requested action was error.” (quoting United States v. Johnson, 183 F.3d 1175, 1178 n.2 (10th Cir. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).