Tenth Circuit· 9/15/2000

United States v. Edward J.

Citations

224 F.3d 1216
55 Fed. R. Serv. 966
2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5506
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23357
2000 WL 1335626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a party can’t obtain reversal by inducing court action and then characterizing that action as erroneous
rejecting such presumptions under Fed. R. Evid. 803(4) and declining to adopt Olesen rationale
“The invited error doctrine prevents a party from inducing action by a court and later seeking reversal on the ground that the requested action was error.”
“The invited error doctrine prevents a party from inducing action by a court and later seeking reversal on the ground that the requested action was error.” (quoting United States v. Johnson, 183 F.3d 1175, 1178 n.2 (10th Cir. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Anderson, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.