Skip to main content

Stout v. State

Citations

  • 834 N.E.2d 707
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1754
  • 2005 WL 2300348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to find defendant's alleged remorse to be a mitigating factor
  • holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to find defendant's alleged remorse to be a mitigating factor
  • holding that the court did not err in not finding the defendant’s alleged remorse to be a mitigating factor
  • holding that the court did not err in not finding the defendant’s alleged remorse to be a mitigating factor
  • noting that a trial court’s determination of remorse is similar to a determination of credibility
  • providing that while the defendant did indicate that he was very sorry for what he did, the trial court was in the best position to judge the sincerity of defendant’s remorseful statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedlander, Sullivan, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.