Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/18/2006
Burgess v. State
Citations
- 854 N.E.2d 35
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1890
- 2006 WL 2662869
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the defendant’s addiction, to which the defendant admitted, was evidence of his propensity to re-offend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-14· cited 1,438×
- Fugate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-02-12· cited 161×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- Henderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-06· cited 76×
- Stout v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-22· cited 53×
- Ruiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-12-07· cited 50×
- Garrett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 39×
- Pennington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-04· cited 33×
- Ajabu v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 30×
- Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-16· cited 29×
- Montgomery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-05-11· cited 25×
- Eaton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-02· cited 18×
- Matshazi v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-22· cited 17×
- McNew v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-25· cited 12×
- Frey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-01-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.