Dedo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the Court of Appeals found that “the restraints placed upon [the defendant] while in [pre-trial] home detention clearly were sufficiently incarcerative to satisfy f lie custody requirement of r§ 6—218(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).