Stanislav Iavorski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the limitations period for untimely motions to reopen can be equitably tolled to accommodate claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
• holding that record established alien had failed to exercise the due diligence required for equitable tolling, even though BIA did not address issue
• holding that equitable tolling applies to 90-day filing period for motions to reopen based on new facts
• holding that the equitable tolling doctrine applies to the 90-day period provided in 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(1)(2000) for filing motions to reopen based on \new facts\
• holding that ineffective assistance of counsel provided a basis for equitable tolling but concluding that the alien’s claim was time-barred because the alien had not exercised due diligence
• holding that limitation on filing motions to reopen immigration proceedings may be equitably tolled but that alien failed to exercise required diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).