Sukhraj Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that review is limited to the BIA’s denial of a motion where no petition was filed from the underlying decision denying asylum
• concluding that the Court was precluded from reaching underlying decision where petition was timely only as to denial of reopening
• concluding that the BIA did not err in finding petitioner’s evidence not material because it did not rebut the agency’s underlying adverse credibility determination
• concluding that the Court was precluded from reaching underlying decision where petition was timely only as to denial of reopening
• holding that BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen when a grant of relief would still be precluded due to a prior adverse credibility determination
• concluding that BIA does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen where evidence submitted with that motion relates to same claim the agency found not credible in the underlying proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).