Stoecklein v. Johnson Electric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant established excusable neglect under NRCP 60(b)(1) after effectively making our own determinations in consideration of the Yochum factors
• recognizing that this state has an \underlying basic policy of deciding a case on the merits whenever possible\
• observing that, while the underlying action alleged fraud, the record did not show that appellant perpetrated a fraud in the court uroceedings
• observing that, while the underlying action alleged fraud, the record did not show that appellant perpetrated a fraud in the court uroceedings
• explaining that this court will not disturb the district court's NRCP 60(b) determination absent an abuse of discretion
• affirming a district court's finding of excusable neglect under NRCP 60(b)(1) where default judgment resulted from a lack of notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).