Skip to main content
· 2/23/1993

Wichinsky v. Mosa

Citations

  • 847 P.2d 727
  • 109 Nev. 84
  • 1993 Nev. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that harm to the plaintiff is an element of tortious interference
  • finding arbitrator demonstrated a manifest disregard of the law by awarding punitive damages in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of fraud, oppression or malice
  • describing problems on appeal presented by deficient record in arbitration appeal
  • “absence of privilege or justification” is a necessary element to a tortious interference claim
  • \An arbitrator enjoys broad discretion in determining issues under an arbitration agreement.\
  • elements of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.