Moseley v. Eighth Judicial District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this court may look to the interpretation of similar federal rules when construing a Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure
• recognizing that this court may look to the interpretation of similar federal rules when construing a Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure
• recognizing that this court may look to the interpretation of similar federal rules when construing a Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure
• concluding that the “interplay and interpretation of NRCP 25 and NRCP 6 are issues of law that we review de novo” (citing to State ex rel. PSC v. District Court, 94 Nev. 42, 44, 574 P.2d 272, 273 (1978))
• acknowledging that this court applies a de novo standard of review to issues concerning a rule’s construction
• concluding that, under NRCP 6(b)(2), excusable neglect may justify an enlargement of time to allow for substitution of a deceased party where the delay was caused by a lack of cooperation from the decedent's family and attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).