Skip to main content

Cook v. Cook

Citations

  • 912 P.2d 264
  • 112 Nev. 179
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that this court reviews a district court's decision on an NRCP 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion
  • explaining that this court reviews the denial of an NRCP 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion
  • providing that this court will review an order regarding an NRCP 60(b) motion to set aside a judgment for an abuse of discretion
  • explaining that this court reviews the denial of an NRCP 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion
  • explaining that the district court has broad discretion in deciding whether to grant or deny an NRCP 60(b) motion and this court will not disturb that decision absent an abuse of discretion
  • providing that the district court has 1 Pursuant to NRAP 34(0(1), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I94Th broad discretion in deciding whether to grant or deny an NRCP 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.