Stewart v. Spalding
Citations
- 23 Haw. 502
- 1916 Haw. LEXIS 50
Syllabus
<p>Contracts — arbitration—condition -precedent to action.</p> <p>Where, by the terms of a contract, an obligation to submit a question to arbitration depends upon a condition precedent, as that a disagreement shall have arisen, the party who sets up the agreement as a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action upon the contract must show that a disagreement did occur whereby a question to arbitrate was raised.</p> <p>Same — building contract — departure from, terms.</p> <p>Where a building contract provides that no alterations shall be made in the work except upon the written order of the architect, and no extra compensation shall be due the contractor for work or material except in accordance with a written agreement or by order of the architect with the approval of the owner, and it is shown that the requirements were not lived up to, but that verbal orders were given, received and acted upon, neither party may set up the provision of the contract to defeat the just claims of the other.</p> <p>Same — same—parol evidence not admissible to vary.</p> <p>In an action on a contract for the erection of a building for an agreed price in accordance with certain plans and specifications, the contract containing a provision as to further compensation for extra work, parol evidence that at the time the contract was entered into a different understanding was had as to the amount of work to be done for the agreed price is not admissible.</p> <p>Sáme — same—time—waiver—action on express contract.</p> <p>Though time be of the essence of a building contract and performance within the time specified is not shown, an action on the express contract may nevertheless be maintained if the requirement as to time was waived by the owner, and the plaintiff may recover by showing that he completed the work in a reasonable time after the date named in the contract.</p> <p>Waiver — question of law or fact.</p> <p>The question of waiver is usually a mixed one of law and fact for the
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The question of waiver is usually a mixed one of law and fact but where the facts are undisputed and are susceptible of but one reasonable inference it becomes one of law for the court.” (Citations omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quarles, Robertson, Watson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 154×
- Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 72×
- Daiichi Hawai'i Real Estate Corp. v. LichterHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 44×
- Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Housing & Community Development Corporation of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court· 2008-01-31· cited 24×
- Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court· 1967-03-28· cited 20×
- Wilart Associates v. Kapiolani Plaza, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1988-12-12· cited 16×
- Fireside Thrift of Hawaii, Inc. v. Kealoha (In Re Kealoha)D. Hawaii· 1980-01-11· cited 10×
- HEW v. ArudaHawaii Supreme Court· 1969-12-04· cited 8×
- Saiki v. Lee SingHawaii Supreme Court· 1923-08-28· cited 8×
- Barwick Pacific Carpet Co. v. Kam Hawaii Construction, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-06-26
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court· 1876-01-11· cited 137×
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 63×
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-02-27· cited 63×
- Wood v. Fort WayneSupreme Court· 1886-12-06· cited 48×
- Smith v. GugertyNew York Supreme Court· 1848-11-08· cited 42×
- Schmulbach v. CaldwellFourth Circuit· 1912-03-02· cited 19×
- Kilby Mfg. Co. v. Hinchman-Renton Fire Proofing Co.Eighth Circuit· 1904-10-31· cited 18×
- Maryland Steel Co. of Baltimore Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 16×
- Ault v. Interstate Saving & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1896-11-27· cited 13×
- Keller v. Robinson & Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1894-11-26· cited 12×
- Reed v. Bankers Union of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals· 1907-01-08· cited 9×
- Stephens v. Essex County Park CommissionThird Circuit· 1906-02-27· cited 9×
- Scott v. Hawaiian Tobacco Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1913-03-26· cited 7×
- Cummings v. Pioneer Building & Loan Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court· 1907-06-18· cited 2×
Other cases named Stewart v. Spalding
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.