Wood v. Fort Wayne
Citations
- 119 U.S. 312
- 7 S. Ct. 219
- 30 L. Ed. 416
- 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1990
Syllabus
<p>In this case, the court construed the language of a written contract for supplying materials and labor in constructing water works for the city of Port Wayne, Indiana, in regard to extra work, and an increase in the quantity of work, caused by an alteration of plan; and in regard to defects in materials furnished by. the city, causing delay and expense to the contractor; and reversed-the judgment of the Circuit Court because of an .erroneous construction by it of such language.</p>
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1940-06-07· cited 52×
- Benjamin Foster Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1945-05-07· cited 45×
- Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-06-24· cited 44×
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1939-10-12· cited 41×
- M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1959-02-27· cited 37×
- Roemheld v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court· 1907-12-17· cited 28×
- Headley v. CavileerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1912-03-04· cited 24×
- Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1889-03-13· cited 20×
- Kilby Mfg. Co. v. Hinchman-Renton Fire Proofing Co.Eighth Circuit· 1904-10-31· cited 18×
- B. F. & C. M. Davis Co. v. W. E. Callaghan Const. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1927-10-05· cited 16×
- Elkan v. Sebastian Bridge Dist.Eighth Circuit· 1923-06-06· cited 15×
- The SapphoFourth Circuit· 1899-05-02· cited 15×
- Stewart v. SpaldingHawaii Supreme Court· 1916-11-17· cited 14×
- Wyandotte & D. R. Ry. v. King Bridge Co.Sixth Circuit· 1900-02-12· cited 12×
- Teer v. George A. Fuller Co.Fourth Circuit· 1929-01-14· cited 11×
- Valley Construction Co. v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-02-04· cited 11×
- Hayden v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court· 1917-05-01· cited 11×
- Pitt Const. Co. v. City of DaytonSixth Circuit· 1916-11-16· cited 11×
- A. H. Barbour & Son, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1967-11-22· cited 10×
- Bay City v. FrazierSixth Circuit· 1935-05-10· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.