Stewart v. Rossi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendant suffered sufficient prejudice to justify total preclusion where he was unable to prepare defense, because for years, plaintiff failed to respond to discovery requests, produce names of fact and expert witnesses, provide any expert reports, or conduct depositions
• upholding trial court’s dismissal sanction when discovery violations were in bad faith and significantly prejudiced the defendant’s defense
• finding a litigant’s actions constituted “egregious” violations of the rules of discovery when the litigant failed to provide adequate responses to discovery requests over a period of several years
• finding a litigant's actions constituted \egregious\ violations of the rules of discovery when the litigant failed to provide adequate responses to discovery requests over a period of several years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).