Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding coroner with years of experience had specialized knowledge regarding time of death and qualified as expert to testify regarding same
• holding coroner with years of experience had specialized knowledge regarding time of death and qualified as expert to testify regarding same
• holding that, because county coroner formed opinions as to time of death and cause of death in the performance of his official duties, these opinions “were not acquired or developed with an eye toward litigation, [and so] Rule 4003.5 is inapplicable”
• holding that, because county coroner formed opinions as to time of death and cause of death in the performance of his official duties, these opinions “were not acquired or developed with an eye toward litigation, [and so] Rule 4003.5 is inapplicable”
• holding coroner could testify regarding time of death because opinion was not developed in anticipation of litigation
• holding that, because county coroner formed opinions as to time of death and cause of death in the performance of his official duties, these opinions “were not acquired or developed with an eye toward litigation, [and so] Rule 4003.5 is inapplicable[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).