Renee Beauty Salons, Inc. v. Blose-Venable

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lists of hair salon’s customers’ names, telephone numbers and styling preferences were not protectible trade secrets because the information was easily obtainable through a number of sources
• if a trial court has reached the correct result, its order will be sustained if it can be sustained for any reason
• lower court erred by enjoining former salon employees from contacting salon customers since the names and styling preferences of those former customers could not constitute protected information
• affirming order denying protection of employer’s customer lists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).