Alpart v. General Land Partners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the gist of the action doctrine barred plaintiffs’ fiduciary duty claim, where the fiduciary duty allegations were based on contractual claims
• finding that a tortious interference with contract claim may serve as the predicate for a civil conspiracy claim
• finding that a claim for civil conspiracy cannot be based on a breach of contract
• “A tortious interference with contract claim is barred by the gist of the action doctrine if it is not independent of a contract claim that is pled along with it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).