Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/14/1999

Stewart v. Murphy

Citations

  • 174 F.3d 530
  • 1999 WL 246710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that each defendant’s actions in a Section 1983 case must be considered individually
  • holding that each defendant’s actions in a Section 1983 case must be considered individually
  • explaining that active treatment of a medical condition is not deliberate indifference
  • explaining that active treatment of a medical condition is not deliberate indifference
  • noting that each individual’s subjective deliberate indifference must be examined separately
  • finding disagreement between physicians as to the proper course of treatment does not show deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Politz, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stewart v. Murphy

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.