Eason v. Thaler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that mere conclusory assertions are not competent summary judgment evidence, and thus are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• stating that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• stating that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• stating that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• conclusory allegations are not competent summary judgment evidence and therefore are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• “[N]egligence is not a theory for which liability may be imposed under section 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).