Harris v. Hegmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner’s broken jaw, not its damaged appearance, was the substantial risk of bodily harm
• holding that a prisoner’s broken jaw, not its damaged appearance, was the substantial risk of bodily harm
• holding that an inmate with a broken jaw and “excruciating pain” stated a claim for relief
• holding that a prisoner’s broken jaw, although not certain to be broken until days later, met the objective requirement on the day it was broken
• holding that a prisoner’s broken jaw, although not certain to be broken until days later, met the objective requirement on the day it was broken
• holding that under the section 1997e exhaustion requirement, limitations on a prisoner’s section 1983 claim is tolled during administrative proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).